Originally uploaded by riabaeck
Last evening I was part of a group we call the Deeper Inquriy Group. Here are my morning reflections – holding the infinite evolutionary dance of individual and collective, and all the beauty and magic as we move as one.
Checking In Today
In a recent circle we talked about bringing circle practice into everyday life. What would that be like to start and end our days together, in circle, coming present to one another – present from Source – from the deepest part of who we are – as an individual and as collective presence?
This is my check-in this morning. My practice is meditation and then journaling. While there is not an other to be present to or with, there is the greater community of conscious others, of humans in circle active and present in the web of life. And this morning you in the Deeper Inquiry group are with me.
I recall last evening the gathering of the Deeper Inquiry Group, a group of OD practitioners who show commitment to be present on a regular basis. We come together once a month to sit in circle, to enter into and from silence, and to be present through conversation to the emergent. These seem to be our implicit agreements. As was also said last night there is a sense of love and compassion that seems, on varying levels, to permeate the group field.
If I reflect back on my 2 or so years with the DIG, I have seen and experienced an evolving pattern from revolving leader facilitation, lots of discussion and debate, and often little depth to something much deeper, slower, and more present. Over the 2 years there was the occasional evening when we diverged (or were led) to tap into other ways of knowing, to complement the rational/logical with a deeper inner subtle knowing. All along, and still, I see the dance of individual wants and needs (ego) trying to know how to be with a more collective presencing process. My sense is this is an evolutionary edge for many of us, to be present to both, to be fully present as individual souls (not egos) in a process that taps into a greater than any one of us, collective knowing. And the collective presence, if you will, comes alive through each of us and in between us. We are essential and yet must give over to something greater than any one of us.
How does this relate to our time last evening? If I sense deeply, am fully present, and bring language to what I am noticing, what emerges now? What is my, from Source, deep check-in this morning?
I sense a bit of the sacred in the middle as the candle brings light. We sit in circle, in silence; there is no structure, no leader, and someone will speak as they feel moved to. (If I recall correctly, this process of waiting and speaking what comes into the middle came into being a few sessions ago. It seems to be very close to Bohmian way of dialogue. We have had some principles on the wall as guidance. They were not there in the beginning last night.)
After one person opened with what was going on for her tonight, I spoke that I would appreciate a check-in from each in the circle. Later some resistance to this would arise as one or two were not sure they really wanted to do that. So there is a question in the middle. What is the meaning of check-in? What does it mean for each of us? Have we different interpretations? Is that OK? Could it be guided with a question? Is it OK for someone to pass? What part of us resists or wants, or doesn’t want? I always like to notice resistance to see what is underneath that.
Later the guiding principles, at the request of one of the group, were displayed again for us to see. She was seeking more guidance and maybe clarity. I recall that the one principle that stood out to me in that moment was “focus on process and not content”. If I take a step back, I notice that our undefined process means that process evolves – or doesn’t. While I sense commitment, interest, and curiosity, I also sense a lot of uncertainty in the collective field. And hesitancy. Is part of this due to lack of process or guiding structure? One person voiced that he is still lacking full trust in the group. What is the relationship between uncertainty as an edge that invites the emergent and enough trust in self and group to go to the edge? What is the dance between some kind of structure (even if very minimal) and being void of defined structure (2 extremes, of course). Where is the minimal optimal?
I also noticed that there is sometimes disturbance in the field. Is this coming out of this hesitancy for the group to fully engage (I do sense this hesitancy)? And so is there some kind of underlying turbulence seeking to find a larger voice? It was said that our group has not tapped its potential, or has untapped potential (or something to that effect). If this is so, what roles were we each playing in that, including the one who raised the point? Are we really willing to look at that? This is a Deeper Inquiry Group. While I sometimes sense we are deepening just a bit, I also sense the discomfort. Often after a deeper dive, someone will bring us back up. Possibly we were out of our comfort zone. And what about the notion of inquiry? More thought on that.
Are we willing to inquire? There is an implication that we would be seeking to know something we don’t yet know. The format (or very minimal) of letting what shows up be the thread of conversation can be aimless and may just be sharing what we already know. Out of the void our thoughts/words seem to seek some kind of meaning; often we struggle. And then content becomes the focus as we humans seek, by nature, to find meaning.
Why not have a line of inquiry? A guiding question? We already have hints showing up. What is deeper inquiry? What is inquiry? What is our purpose in coming together? Why are we there? What is the potential and meaning of check-in? Is there a minimal optimal structure? What is the meaning and role of uncertainty, trust, impermanence, love, silence, fear, the future potential? What are the key components of deep collective practice, of tapping into Source, of collective presencing? And can we ask those questions from an experiential place, in the moment? Not from a head space alone? Can we come from the wholeness of who we are into collective presencing and hold true open space?
I think we are stuck in not wanting to be uncomfortable – and we are on the verge of something new. I think we hold the potential for evolving collective presencing practice that can become a new human practice. If we look, there are openings. There are people, often younger than most in our circle, who are ready to jump. They are hungry. They are seeking our wisdom. They want to learn at an accelerated rate. They are fast and we are learning to slow down. Is there room and a place for both? I also see little emerging organizations (Paul Hawken, Blessed Unrest) who are on the cusp. They are ready. Are we? How can we truly serve?
My questions are endless. What are yours? What are you curious about? How does that relate to the minimal optimal structure for collective presencing or deeper inquiry practice? How can we as individuals truly engage collectively? And I see in-the-world, practical application. Are we ready? As Malaena recently said (in a similar context), “We are open for business.” Are we?
With love and deep commitment to the process,
Judy











